Public-record basis
Signals are derived from public-record datasets and source metadata rather than private surveillance or hidden data.
Methodology
Evidence-led scoring before manual action
AssetSentry is designed around explainable public-record signals, source review, confidence checks and false-positive controls. The aim is to reduce noise while keeping evidence visible.
Approach
How signals are handled
Transparent scoring reasons
Candidate scores are intended to show why a record deserves review, including filings, charges, status and property links.
False-positive controls
Warnings and review states help separate strong evidence from weak matches, noisy names, generic security and address ambiguity.
Source limitations
Public records can be incomplete, delayed, duplicated or ambiguous. AssetSentry is designed to keep that uncertainty visible.
Manual evidence review
Records are queued for inspection with supporting context before any report, decision or further research action is taken.
Report discipline
Promising cases can be saved into structured deal packs only after evidence has been reviewed and annotated.
Important limitations
AssetSentry should not be used to infer confirmed insolvency, distress, ownership or recoverability from a single record. The product is being built to help researchers prioritise manual inspection by bringing relevant public-record evidence into one place.
The platform is not affiliated with Companies House, HM Land Registry or any government body. Source records should be checked directly where accuracy matters.